-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 424
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci(langgraph): fix flaky test #12024
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sabrenner
added
the
changelog/no-changelog
A changelog entry is not required for this PR.
label
Jan 22, 2025
|
lievan
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2025
BenchmarksBenchmark execution time: 2025-01-22 15:27:15 Comparing candidate commit bff15d2 in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 393 metrics, 2 unstable metrics. scenario:iast_aspects-ospathsplitext_aspect
|
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2025
## What does this PR do Tests like `test_fanning_graph_async` would fail because it may be possible for the two children being called from a common node (ie node `a` calling nodes `b` and `c`) to execute in any order. Although this is probably only particular to async fanning tests, this PR changes the logic such that: - for LLMObs tests, we find spans by name and assert LLMObs properties after. This might be tricky if we have duplicate span names (ie two `LangGraph` spans), but for now this isn't the case - for APM tests, we assert that all span resource names appear an expected number of times. We can probably make these tests more robust with snapshots but this can be done in a later PR ## Checklist - [x] PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met - The PR description includes an overview of the change - The PR description articulates the motivation for the change - The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy - The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any - Newly-added code is easy to change - The change follows the [library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) - The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary - Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met - Title is accurate - All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - Newly-added code is easy to change - Release note makes sense to a user of the library - If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) (cherry picked from commit 2f52abb)
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do
Tests like
test_fanning_graph_async
would fail because it may be possible for the two children being called from a common node (ie nodea
calling nodesb
andc
) to execute in any order. Although this is probably only particular to async fanning tests, this PR changes the logic such that:LangGraph
spans), but for now this isn't the caseChecklist
Reviewer Checklist