Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[scala3] Enable scala3_sources #222

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024
Merged

[scala3] Enable scala3_sources #222

merged 13 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

kczulko
Copy link
Contributor

@kczulko kczulko commented Feb 6, 2024

This PR attempts to enable scala3_sources scalapb option which is described here.

@pjfanning
Copy link
Contributor

@kczulko will this break on our Scala 2.12 build?

@kczulko
Copy link
Contributor Author

kczulko commented Feb 6, 2024

I don't think so. We're using both scala2 and scala3 in our project (the same code is being compiled twice, due to moving-to-scala3 refactoring process...). I've been checking this via +publishLocal and all was fine. Also tests were passed.

@mdedetrich
Copy link
Contributor

My gut feeling is that this should be targeting 1.1.x, @pjfanning wdyt?

@pjfanning
Copy link
Contributor

pjfanning commented Feb 6, 2024

it doesn't yet work - it seems to break on Scala 2.12 as I suspected it might https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-grpc/actions/runs/7797963372/job/21265803687?pr=222

[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:10843:1: name clash: <Type>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.ExtensionRangeOptions,?>) in com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.ExtensionRangeOptions.Builder and <T>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<MessageT,T>) in com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.ExtendableBuilder have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error]       public <Type> Builder clearExtension(
[info] [error]           com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<
[info] [error]               com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.ExtensionRangeOptions, ?> extension) {
[info] [error]         return super.clearExtension(extension);
[info] [error]       }
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:10842:1: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:24389:1: name clash: <Type>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.FileOptions,?>) in com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.FileOptions.Builder and <T>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<MessageT,T>) in com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.ExtendableBuilder have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error]       public <Type> Builder clearExtension(
[info] [error]           com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<
[info] [error]               com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.FileOptions, ?> extension) {
[info] [error]         return super.clearExtension(extension);
[info] [error]       }
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:24388:1: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:27692:1: name clash: <Type>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.MessageOptions,?>) in com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.MessageOptions.Builder and <T>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<MessageT,T>) in com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.ExtendableBuilder have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error]       public <Type> Builder clearExtension(
[info] [error]           com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<
[info] [error]               com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.MessageOptions, ?> extension) {
[info] [error]         return super.clearExtension(extension);
[info] [error]       }
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:27691:1: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:29999:1: name clash: <Type>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.FieldOptions,?>) in com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.FieldOptions.Builder and <T>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<MessageT,T>) in com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.ExtendableBuilder have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error]       public <Type> Builder clearExtension(
[info] [error]           com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<
[info] [error]               com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.FieldOptions, ?> extension) {
[info] [error]         return super.clearExtension(extension);
[info] [error]       }
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:29998:1: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:31569:1: name clash: <Type>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.OneofOptions,?>) in com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.OneofOptions.Builder and <T>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<MessageT,T>) in com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.ExtendableBuilder have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error]       public <Type> Builder clearExtension(
[info] [error]           com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<
[info] [error]               com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.OneofOptions, ?> extension) {
[info] [error]         return super.clearExtension(extension);
[info] [error]       }
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:31568:1: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:32700:1: name clash: <Type>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.EnumOptions,?>) in com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.EnumOptions.Builder and <T>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<MessageT,T>) in com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.ExtendableBuilder have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error]       public <Type> Builder clearExtension(
[info] [error]           com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<
[info] [error]               com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.EnumOptions, ?> extension) {
[info] [error]         return super.clearExtension(extension);
[info] [error]       }
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:32699:1: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:33885:1: name clash: <Type>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.EnumValueOptions,?>) in com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.EnumValueOptions.Builder and <T>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<MessageT,T>) in com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.ExtendableBuilder have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error]       public <Type> Builder clearExtension(
[info] [error]           com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<
[info] [error]               com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.EnumValueOptions, ?> extension) {
[info] [error]         return super.clearExtension(extension);
[info] [error]       }
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:33884:1: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:35008:1: name clash: <Type>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.ServiceOptions,?>) in com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.ServiceOptions.Builder and <T>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<MessageT,T>) in com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.ExtendableBuilder have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error]       public <Type> Builder clearExtension(
[info] [error]           com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<
[info] [error]               com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.ServiceOptions, ?> extension) {
[info] [error]         return super.clearExtension(extension);
[info] [error]       }
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:35007:1: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:36322:1: name clash: <Type>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.MethodOptions,?>) in com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.MethodOptions.Builder and <T>clearExtension(com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<MessageT,T>) in com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessageV3.ExtendableBuilder have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [error]       public <Type> Builder clearExtension(
[info] [error]           com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage.GeneratedExtension<
[info] [error]               com.google.protobuf.DescriptorProtos.MethodOptions, ?> extension) {
[info] [error]         return super.clearExtension(extension);
[info] [error]       }
[info] [error] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/google/protobuf/DescriptorProtos.java:36321:1: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
[info] [error] @java.lang.Override
[info] [info] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/github/xds/service/orca/v3/OrcaLoadReportRequest.java: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
[info] [info] /tmp/sbt_d17428cc/target/scala-2.12/pekko-grpc/main/com/github/xds/service/orca/v3/OrcaLoadReportRequest.java: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
[info] [error] (Compile / compileIncremental) javac returned non-zero exit code
[info] [error] Total time: 66 s (01:06), completed Feb 6, 2024 10:15:54 AM

@pjfanning pjfanning added this to the v1.1.0 milestone Feb 6, 2024
@mdedetrich
Copy link
Contributor

it doesn't yet work - it seems to break Scala 2.12 as I suspected it might https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-grpc/actions/runs/7797963372/job/21265803687?pr=222

Probably need to pass some flags to scalacOptions so that the scala 2.12 compiler can accept the scala 3 source style

@kczulko
Copy link
Contributor Author

kczulko commented Feb 6, 2024

Probably need to pass some flags to scalacOptions so that the scala 2.12 compiler can accept the scala 3 source style

The errors are coming from java files. For now I don't get it what could cause this issue. Do you have some suggestions?

@mdedetrich
Copy link
Contributor

Probably need to pass some flags to scalacOptions so that the scala 2.12 compiler can accept the scala 3 source style

The errors are coming from java files. For now I don't get it what could cause this issue. Do you have some suggestions?

So that file is generated by googles own protobuf compiler so you shouldn't even manually be modifying it. Maybe we need to update the google protobuf compiler as well?

@kczulko
Copy link
Contributor Author

kczulko commented Feb 6, 2024

As I'm bumping the scalapb compilerplugin I suspect the incompatibility may be here? https://github.com/scalapb/ScalaPB/blob/71befffd3db412d158fabb807ded56920fa0030f/project/Dependencies.scala#L7

@pjfanning
Copy link
Contributor

yes - a big bump in io.grpc libs causes us issues - eg #190

@kczulko
Copy link
Contributor Author

kczulko commented Feb 7, 2024

@pjfanning
Regarding failed test case... There's the protobuf-javascript issue. Do you want to workaround it somehow? It would require more work to get fixed. I've tried with golang instead of js. As a nixos user, I added protoc-gen-go to my nix shell (so that it appears in PATH) and slightly modified 06-compatibility-plugins test case. With nix it's easy however if you'd like to avoid nix, then it requires more code to determine developer's OS and whole download/unzip/(add-to-path | configure-build.sbt) logic. Or some shenanigans could be done on the .github workflow files but I would rather want to keep coherent configuration for both local and CI envs.

Next thing - I don't know why Link Validator build step failed :)

@pjfanning
Copy link
Contributor

The Link Validator tests are very brittle. It calls all the linked sites and many of them fail on occasion.
The compatibility test is something we can probably rework or remove. Let me discuss it with other contributors.

@pjfanning
Copy link
Contributor

@mdedetrich is it ok to remove the compatibility test that is failing and log a new issue to replace it? grpc refactored the javascript support and the test needs to be rewritten or replaced if we want to upgrade grpc libs.

@pjfanning pjfanning mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2024
@kczulko
Copy link
Contributor Author

kczulko commented Feb 9, 2024

@pjfanning @mdedetrich
Please let me know if there's anything you want from me to push it forward.

Thanks in advance,
Karol

@raboof
Copy link
Member

raboof commented Feb 12, 2024

With nix it's easy however if you'd like to avoid nix, then it requires more code to determine developer's OS and whole download/unzip/(add-to-path | configure-build.sbt) logic. Or some shenanigans could be done on the .github workflow files but I would rather want to keep coherent configuration for both local and CI envs

since this is an sbt integration test, I think it's OK if there's some prerequisites for running it (such as putting protoc-gen-go on the PATH). If we can add that to the GHA script and document that the user needs to do that themselves (however it needs to be done on their OS), then I think we're OK.

@kczulko
Copy link
Contributor Author

kczulko commented Feb 13, 2024

@raboof

Ok then. Let me try to do it. I'll use this gh action together with this go install command. However, I'm not allowed to check how this will work under github actions env since contributors have to wait for the CI run approval. Therefore I'd like to ask you (the contributors) to eventually fix all the shortcomings (as you can probably do it without waiting for approvals).

Best regards,
Karol

package org.apache.pekko.grpc.gen.scaladsl

private[scaladsl] class ScalaCompatConstants(emitScala3Sources: Boolean = false) {
// val WildcardType: String = if (emitScala3Sources) "?" else "_"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this can be dropped

new PekkoDiscoveryNameResolver(discovery, defaultPort, targetUri.getAuthority, portName, protocol, resolveTimeout)
}
override def newNameResolver(targetUri: URI, args: NameResolver.Args): PekkoDiscoveryNameResolver =
new PekkoDiscoveryNameResolver(discovery, defaultPort, serviceName, portName, protocol, resolveTimeout)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change related/required for the switch to the new io.grpc version and introduction of scala3_sources?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like authority is no longer passed when newNameResolver is called.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, that is slightly scary (I assume the assert was there for a reason), but if you're confident this is a correct fix then 👍

# under the License.

# Upgrade to io.grpc 1.60 caused this bin compat issue
ProblemFilters.exclude[DirectMissingMethodProblem]("org.apache.pekko.grpc.internal.PekkoDiscoveryNameResolverProvider.this")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 since internal

@@ -184,8 +183,7 @@ class NonBalancingIntegrationSpec(backend: String)

val failure =
client.sayHello(HelloRequest(s"Hello friend")).failed.futureValue.asInstanceOf[StatusRuntimeException]
failure.getStatus.getCode should be(Code.UNAVAILABLE)
client.closed.failed.futureValue shouldBe a[ClientConnectionException]
failure.getStatus.getCode should (equal(Code.UNKNOWN).or(equal(Code.UNAVAILABLE)))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

strange but no problem

@raboof
Copy link
Member

raboof commented Feb 20, 2024

Great work here!

I'm confused why the Validate and test CI workflow (from build-test.yml) isn't running here

Seq(Compile, Test).flatMap(inConfig(_)(PB.targets += PB.gens.js -> resourceManaged.value / "js"))
Seq(Compile, Test).flatMap(inConfig(_)(
Seq(
PB.targets += PB.gens.go -> resourceManaged.value / "go")))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the ProtocJSPlugin object renamed to something ProtocGoPlugin?

@raboof
Copy link
Member

raboof commented Feb 20, 2024

the GHA error seems to be 'every step must define a uses or run key' - though this is strange since it seems you do.

@samueleresca
Copy link
Member

the GHA error seems to be 'every step must define a uses or run key' - though this is strange since it seems you do.

I think that error is caused by the Install go & go-protobuf step defined with 2 "-":

      - name: Install go & go-protobuf
      - uses: actions/setup-go@v5
      ...

@raboof
Copy link
Member

raboof commented Feb 20, 2024

the GHA error seems to be 'every step must define a uses or run key' - though this is strange since it seems you do.

I think that error is caused by the Install go & go-protobuf step defined with 2 "-":

      - name: Install go & go-protobuf
      - uses: actions/setup-go@v5
      ...

ah, indeed, sharp eyes!

with:
go-version: '^1.20'
run: go install google.golang.org/protobuf/cmd/[email protected]

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah looks like we have to split this into two: "a step cannot have both the uses and run keys"

@kczulko
Copy link
Contributor Author

kczulko commented Feb 20, 2024

Dear Lord... I think it's ok now :D

@raboof
Copy link
Member

raboof commented Feb 20, 2024

It seems the link validator isn't wrong here, and the license report is linking to http://www.jetbrains.org for a new org.jetbrains:annotations:13.0 dependency. We might want to add http://www.jetbrains.org to the non-https-whitelist in ./scripts/link-validator.conf?

@raboof raboof merged commit d154013 into apache:main Feb 20, 2024
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants