-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[builder] normalized layer improvements #884
Merged
Merged
Changes from 18 commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f25883f
improve normalized layer floating point precision, and correct normal…
2324c4b
fix int32 overflow in sparse matrix code
8b295a5
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
1f29275
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
9b11017
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
88e1611
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
9a6d9cf
add check for tiledb issue 1969
4a33328
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
044a299
bump dependency versions
d386a54
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
2b76d8c
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
654c0e5
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
6183067
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
1a88854
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
ddd4410
work around SOMA bug temporarily
2aba251
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
8a5822c
merge with schema-four
ab9960c
Merge branch 'bkmartinjr/schema-four' into bkmartinjr/norm-layer
c8fc4bc
pr feedback
0d9ba30
[builder] port to use enums in schema (#896)
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the schema also mention the precision reduction being performed? Or are we satisfied that it's near equivalence justifies not having to mention it? (I did see Pablo's verification)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this PR does not introduce precision reduction, just improves it. I leave this up to @pablo-gar to resolve at a later date, at his discretion.