[FR] update Serverless #3238
Merged
[FR] update Serverless #3238
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Bernard <[email protected]>
guillaumebernard84
requested review from
huats,
Krast76 and
sestegra
as code owners
✅ Deploy Preview for cncfglossary ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Bernard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Bernard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Bernard <[email protected]>
|
J'ai fait beaucoup de commits, sorry. Il ne faudra pas oublier de squash quand on fera le merge |
Signed-off-by: Guillaume BERNARD <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume BERNARD <[email protected]>
content/fr/serverless.md
Outdated
| Une fois déployées, les applications serverless répondent à la demande et se mettent à l'échelle automatiquement. | ||
| Les offres serverless des fournisseurs de cloud public sont généralement jaugés à l'utilisation au travers d'un modèle d'exécution basé sur des événements. | ||
| Par conséquent, lorsqu'une fonction serverless est inutilisée, il n'y a pas de coûts associés. | ||
| L'informatique serverless, que l'on pourrait traduire littéralement "sans serveur", [abstrait](/fr/abstraction/) les serveurs pour l'utilisateur. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Il manque le verbe 'éloigne les serveurs de l'utilisateur'
Remplacé pour/de
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Le verbe c'est "abstrait" qui est entre crochets car il renvoie vers /fr/abstraction/
Ce qui fait que "pour" conviens bien.
Je pense que abstraire est mieux qu'éloigner, mais je suis ouvert aux autres avis
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remplacer "les serveurs pour l'utilisateur" par "les serveurs du point de vue de l'utilisateur"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ça me parait bien, je fait ça!
Signed-off-by: Guillaume BERNARD <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume BERNARD <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your changes
FaaS and serverless were updated by this PR: #2217
We need to reflect these changes
Related issue number or link (ex:
resolves #issue-number)Resolves #3236
Checklist before opening this PR (put
xin the checkboxes)git commit -s) is to affirm that commits comply DCO. If you are working locally, you could add an alias to yourgitconfigby runninggit config --global alias.ci "commit -s".