-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 605
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] replace babel & browserify with rollup #948
Conversation
Hi @leeoniya, thanks for the contribution! Rollup seems like a good fit for dygraphs and I'd like to incorporate this change. My main question is whether this breaks any of the exported APIs. A few ways to check this are:
|
i opened a few and they worked ok, but since many tests require interaction or are subtle, i dont even know what to look for. for me to manually verify that all features work exactly the same with no automated testing is pretty much impossible. i think this is something only you can do :(
this looks fine. |
I pulled this branch and opened a few of the tests. This seems good. What's required to get the tests to pass? |
quite a bit more, actually. after some tweaks to avoid when opening once we get all tests passing, i'll try to hook up istanbul for coverage and replace phantomjs with puppeteer [1]. i don't know too much about travis and will be pretty much useless for any non-trivial tweaking of remaining shell scripts, so hopefully you can take over from there. |
i'm going to keep digging. i'm starting to understand a bit better how the tests are structured. |
ok, i got all
|
- create a global Dygraph.setGetContext for testing & Proxy injection - test actual, standalone built lib (don't re-bundle Dygraph into tests) - use hackish access to RangeSelectorPlugin constructor - fix a few off-by-one fuzzy pixel errors
hey @danvk, is this project effectively abandoned? |
unfortunately i have enough of my own open source projects to maintain. the dygraphs codebase is too large for someone unfamiliar with it to start maintaining it without a very significant time investment. like most people, i probably only personally use 20% of the functionality/options, so it's hard to justify making such a commitment to study the whole thing well enough to make well-informed choices on a project-wide scale. if you don't have time to review PRs (even as simple/ready-to-go as this one), then you certainly won't have time to answer many many questions about the details of the codebase and intricate interactions between options, etc. |
@kraliq233 i'm now using uPlot and have no further plans to pursue this PR. |
this replaces babel & browserify with the much smaller and more efficient Rollup & a couple plugins (total node_modules: 7.89 MB, 469 Files). rollup also does a better job of dead code elim:
dygraph.min.js
: 122 KB -> 106 KBi'll leave this in WIP status until i get some feedback, since PRs seem to hang around in this repo with no activity :(