Attorney checkout flow given a valid ama appeal submits draft decision Failure/Error: expect(page).to have_content(COPY::JUDGE_CHECKOUT_DISPATCH_SUCCESS_MESSAGE_TITLE % appeal.veteran_full_name) expected to find text "Thank you for reviewing Bob Smithschamberger's decision." in "CaseflowQueue\nSearch cases\nCSSID4373242 (VACO)\nBob SmithschambergerVeteran ID: 170430012 \nView all cases\nEvaluate Decision\nCurrently active tasks\nASSIGNED ON\n11/15/2024\nDAYS WAITING\n0\nGray dot: Pending\nASSIGNED TO\nCSSID4373242\nASSIGNED BY\nL. Roth\nTASK\nReview\nView task instructions\nCase Timeliness\nCase Type: Original\nTotal days since attorney assigned: 0\nDays worked by attorney: 0\n\n11/15/24 - Assigned to attorney\nNo tasks to show\n11/15/24 - Decision submitted to judge\n\nComplexity of case\nHow would you rate the complexity of this case?\nEasy\nMedium\nHard\nQuality of work\nHow would you rate the overall quality of this case?\n5 - Outstanding\n4 - Exceeds expectations\n3 - Meets expectations\n2 - Needs improvements\n1 - Does not meet expectations\nIdentify positive feedback:\nResponsive to contentions and theories\nWell-analyzed lay evidence\nWell-analyzed medical evidence\nGood hidden issue-spotting and analysis\nConcise, understandable, Veteran-centric writing\nAppropriate use of law, precedential opinion and administrative procedure\nLogically organized\nNo substantive revisions\nWell proofed (no to minimal typos/grammar errors)\nWell-annotated file for VLJ review to include appropriate use of tags and comments\nRemand is concise and provides detailed, understandable directives\nIdentify areas for improvement\nThe attorney did not properly consider and apply:\nTheory contention\nCase law\nStatute/regulation\nAdministrative procedure, procedure opinion\nRelevant records (medical, service, employment)\nLay evidence\nOther areas for improvement:\nDid not properly identify and address one or more issues before the Board\nFindings are not supported by adequate reasons, bases\nDid not adequately address due process violations\nRemands not complete, legally sufficient or require necessary development\nMajor or frequent spelling, grammar, typographical, usage, formatting errors\nAdditional Comments\nOptional\nShare more details about your evaluation\nShare more details about your evaluation\nCancelBack\nContinue\nSend feedback"

Process completed with exit code 1.

The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: actions/checkout@v3, actions/cache/restore@v3, actions/upload-artifact@v3. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128