Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TIP-120] DAO Vote: PCVGuardian v3 #952
[TIP-120] DAO Vote: PCVGuardian v3 #952
Changes from all commits
04c43b8
5d37dbd
8546f7b
915d275
1dbaf4b
531415d
9428149
5508ba7
15374db
fef615c
283adc1
b074e98
f59d04b
8752fb3
ce69cf3
4787aeb
f0c0444
a8ee388
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we not need this to withdraw from paused deposits?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we do, that's why before withdrawals the modifier reads the paused state & unpauses if the deposit is paused
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No strong feelings and fine as is, but not a fan of having the control flow jumping about in this modifier. The modifier runs before the function executes and checks permissions etc., then passes the control flow back to the function on line 223, then will take the control flow back once the function is done.
Might be cleaner and a nicer seperation of
before
andafter
logic if this modifier was split out into two hooks:_beforeWithdrawal()
and_afterWithdrawal()
which then get called in the function bodyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the modifier is better because we want the paused stated read before withdrawal to be used after withdrawal (to re-pause), we can't do that without modifier
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we agreed to leave depositAfter in?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes we kept
depositAfter
, the diff is displaying very weird 🤔 this logic is now in the modifier