Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add recursiveResolve #274

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

feat: add recursiveResolve #274

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

lpatiny
Copy link
Member

@lpatiny lpatiny commented Dec 5, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.27%. Comparing base (38cd88b) to head (fe89f1a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #274      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.25%   96.27%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         181      182       +1     
  Lines        4997     5016      +19     
  Branches     1130     1137       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         4810     4829      +19     
  Misses        187      187              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lpatiny lpatiny merged commit 9005fc2 into main Dec 5, 2024
10 checks passed
@lpatiny lpatiny deleted the recursive branch December 5, 2024 10:10
Comment on lines +1 to +7
/**
* wait recursively so that all promises are resolved
* need to go through all the nested objects and check if it is a promise
* if it is a promise, then await it
* @param object
* @returns
*/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no problem to use copilot to generate code, but please update the documentation for a human now :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants