Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add configurable httpd timeout #403

Conversation

fernandoroyosanchez
Copy link
Contributor

@fernandoroyosanchez fernandoroyosanchez commented Oct 23, 2024

This patch adds an apiTimeout field to the OctaviaSpecCore to the already OctaviaSpec one to allow configure the timeouts for HAProxy and Apache.

Also fixing core API spec version of the new GetDefaultRouteAnnotations function.

Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-6713

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Hi @fernandoroyosanchez. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openstack-k8s-operators member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@gthiemonge
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@fernandoroyosanchez fernandoroyosanchez force-pushed the apitimeouthttpd branch 3 times, most recently from 08f3d3c to 586f791 Compare October 24, 2024 17:33
@@ -141,6 +141,10 @@ type OctaviaAPISpecCore struct {
// +operator-sdk:csv:customresourcedefinitions:type=spec
// TLS - Parameters related to the TLS
TLS OctaviaApiTLS `json:"tls,omitempty"`

// +kubebuilder:validation:Optional
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. here it's defined as Optional

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for reopening this, but you left this Optional. Was that intentional?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, to keep option to be passed by spec otherwise we trust on the octavia_api one and it will be passed by the controller

templates/octaviaapi/config/httpd.conf Show resolved Hide resolved
@fernandoroyosanchez fernandoroyosanchez force-pushed the apitimeouthttpd branch 4 times, most recently from 49e1839 to 8dd4a0a Compare October 25, 2024 13:40
@gthiemonge
Copy link
Contributor

/test octavia-operator-build-deploy-kuttl
registry quay.rdoproject.org: Get "https://quay.rdoproject.org/v2/": dial tcp 38.129.56.158:443: i/o timeout

@gthiemonge
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the approved label Oct 28, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez added a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
This patch allows Octavia to set its route annotations.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/octavia-operator#403
@fernandoroyosanchez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
@weinimo
Copy link
Collaborator

weinimo commented Nov 12, 2024

lgtm apart from the question

@weinimo
Copy link
Collaborator

weinimo commented Nov 12, 2024

/lgtm

@gthiemonge
Copy link
Contributor

/approved

@gthiemonge
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 13, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fernandoroyosanchez, gthiemonge

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit e5285aa into openstack-k8s-operators:main Nov 13, 2024
5 checks passed
fernandoroyosanchez pushed a commit to fernandoroyosanchez/openstack-operator that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
@fernandoroyosanchez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick 18.0-fr1

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@fernandoroyosanchez: new pull request created: #414

In response to this:

/cherry-pick 18.0-fr1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants