Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

check relations domains #26

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2019
Merged

check relations domains #26

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2019

Conversation

odanoburu
Copy link
Collaborator

thanks to @hmuniz for pointing out the lack of this check!

  • relations.tsv
  • use commas for pos column
  • add satellite adjectives PoS
  • validation
  • check that a relation has the correct domain (either synset or
    wordsense of the appropriate PoS)

related to #6

- use commas for pos column
- add satellite adjectives PoS

* validation

- check that a relation has the correct domain (either synset or
  wordsense of the appropriate PoS)

obs: maybe this is too much to check in the parser phase and we should
defer it to validation? (the parser is not so easy to read now)

related to #6
@@ -1,34 +1,34 @@
name lexicographer file text file rdf pos domain description
antonymOf ! ant wn30/own-pt/schema/antonymOf nvar word Antonym
antonymOf ! ant wn30/own-pt/schema/antonymOf n,v,a,r word Antonym
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

algum problema com essa mudança? imagino que não mas é bom checar rs

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tudo top!

@odanoburu odanoburu merged commit 6e73b1b into master Aug 30, 2019
@hmuniz hmuniz deleted the check-relation-domain branch September 2, 2019 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants