Add suppressions

[henrikth93]

This commit will add suppressions for "Long method"

Contributor checklist

• [] This pull request is on a separate branch and not the main branch

---

Description

Related issue

• Fix linting issue due to Long Methods #111

[github-actions]

Thank you for the pull request!

The Scribe team will do our best to address your contribution as soon as we can. The following is a checklist for maintainers to make sure this process goes as well as possible. Feel free to address the points below yourself in further commits if you realize that actions are needed :)

If you're not already a member of our public Matrix community, please consider joining! We'd suggest using Element as your Matrix client, and definitely join the General and Android rooms once you're in. Also consider joining our bi-weekly Saturday dev syncs. It'd be great to have you!

Maintainer checklist

• The linting and formatting workflows within the PR checks do not indicate new errors in the files changed

• The CHANGELOG has been updated with a description of the changes for the upcoming release and the corresponding issue (if necessary)

[andrewtavis]

@angrezichatterbox, are you good with the suppressions here, or should any of these be broken up?

[angrezichatterbox]

@angrezichatterbox, are you good with the suppressions here, or should any of these be broken up?

I suggested using Suppress for now as some of the classes would be modified or deleted. @henrikth93 Apologies for earlier stating that MyKeyboardView has to be suppressed for handling LongMethod. We could refractor a few of its functions but we would have to consider a throughout check of whether the keyboard is being drawn properly. Other classes for now I think its fine to have them suppressed as it would be removed later on.

[andrewtavis]

Now I'm just confused 😅 Sorry, so we need to be explicit to say that we want tests to run? And the test was passing, then I removed the true entries because I thought it would default to being ran, and then the test failed, and now I've added them back in and it fails still?

[angrezichatterbox]

Now I'm just confused 😅 Sorry, so we need to be explicit to say that we want tests to run? And the test was passing, then I removed the true entries because I thought it would default to being ran, and then the test failed, and now I've added them back in and it fails still?

We have to rebase the branch with the main and then fix the remaining linting issues. This would fix the problem. I had a similar issue with my PR where I was shown a linting issue in a line that was not present in my branch.

[henrikth93]

Now I'm just confused 😅 Sorry, so we need to be explicit to say that we want tests to run? And the test was passing, then I removed the true entries because I thought it would default to being ran, and then the test failed, and now I've added them back in and it fails still?

We have to rebase the branch with the main and then fix the remaining linting issues. This would fix the problem. I had a similar issue with my PR where I was shown a linting issue in a line that was not present in my branch.

Alright!

[andrewtavis]

Beautiful stuff, @henrikth93! 🚀 Thanks for the quick fix here and cleaning my mess :)