-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
modify ParseError to FromError for agent handler #2667
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to error handling across multiple methods in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2667 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 23.99% 24.03% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 539 539
Lines 47193 47117 -76
==========================================
Hits 11323 11323
+ Misses 35101 35026 -75
+ Partials 769 768 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 21
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go (1)
Fix Typographical Errors and Address Method Inconsistencies
The shell script execution has confirmed the presence of
st.Massage()
in theStreamListObject
method. This typo should be corrected tost.Message()
to prevent potential runtime errors.Additionally, the inconsistencies between the AI-generated summary and the actual changes in the
StreamListObject
method need to be clarified to ensure accurate documentation and understanding of the code.
- File:
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go
- Lines with Typos:
- Line X:
sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...)
- Line Y:
span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...)
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-320
: Overall improvements with minor issues and need for clarificationThe changes in this file generally improve the error handling mechanism by using
status.FromError
instead ofstatus.ParseError
. This is a positive change that makes the code more idiomatic and efficient.However, there are a few issues that need to be addressed:
There are consistent typos where
st.Massage()
is used instead ofst.Message()
. This needs to be fixed throughout the file to prevent runtime errors.There's an inconsistency between the AI-generated summary and the visible changes in the
StreamListObject
method. The summary mentions changes that are not visible in the provided code.To improve the overall quality and consistency of the codebase:
- Consider using a linter or IDE tool to catch typos like
Massage
vsMessage
across the entire codebase.- Implement a code review checklist that includes verifying the consistency between code changes and summaries.
- Consider adding unit tests to verify the correct behavior of error handling in these methods.
To ensure all instances of the typo are corrected and to verify the changes in the
StreamListObject
method, you can run the following script:This script will help identify any remaining instances of the typo and show the context around the
StreamListObject
method for verification.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for remaining instances of st.Massage() and verify StreamListObject changes echo "Checking for st.Massage() instances:" rg "st\.Massage\(\)" pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go echo "\nChecking for changes in StreamListObject method:" rg -A 10 -B 10 "func \(s \*server\) StreamListObject" pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.goLength of output: 961
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/upsert.go (4)
155-158
: Improved error handling in StreamUpsert method.The changes simplify the error handling logic and fix a typo in the error message retrieval. These improvements enhance the clarity and efficiency of error handling.
Consider adding error checking for
status.FromError
:-st, _ = status.FromError(err) +st, ok := status.FromError(err) +if !ok { + // Handle the case where err is not a gRPC status + st = status.New(codes.Unknown, err.Error()) +}This ensures that even non-gRPC errors are properly handled and converted to a gRPC status.
174-177
: Consistent error handling improvements in StreamUpsert method.The changes maintain the improved error handling approach throughout the method, enhancing consistency and clarity.
As suggested earlier, consider adding error checking for
status.FromError
:-st, _ = status.FromError(err) +st, ok := status.FromError(err) +if !ok { + // Handle the case where err is not a gRPC status + st = status.New(codes.Unknown, err.Error()) +}This ensures consistent handling of both gRPC and non-gRPC errors.
321-324
: Consistent error handling improvements in MultiUpsert method.The changes align with the improvements made in the StreamUpsert method, maintaining a consistent error handling approach across different methods in the file.
For consistency with the previous suggestions, consider adding error checking for
status.FromError
:-st, _ = status.FromError(err) +st, ok := status.FromError(err) +if !ok { + // Handle the case where err is not a gRPC status + st = status.New(codes.Unknown, err.Error()) +}This ensures uniform handling of both gRPC and non-gRPC errors across all methods.
Line range hint
1-332
: Overall improvement in error handling across the file.The changes in this file consistently enhance the error handling mechanism in the StreamUpsert and MultiUpsert methods. By replacing
status.ParseError
withstatus.FromError
and correcting the method name fromst.Massage()
tost.Message()
, the code becomes more efficient and clearer.These improvements contribute to better error reporting and potentially easier debugging. The suggested additions for error checking would further strengthen the robustness of the error handling.
Consider creating a helper function for error handling to ensure consistency across all methods and reduce code duplication. This function could encapsulate the error to status conversion, error checking, and span updates. For example:
func handleError(err error, span trace.Span) *status.Status { st, ok := status.FromError(err) if !ok { st = status.New(codes.Unknown, err.Error()) } if span != nil { span.RecordError(err) span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) span.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) } return st }This would simplify the error handling code in each method and ensure consistent behavior across the package.
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/search.go (1)
Line range hint
351-544
: Overall improvement in error handling, but with recurring issues.The changes consistently improve error handling across all search methods by using
status.FromError(err)
. This is a good improvement that simplifies the error handling process. However, there are two recurring issues throughout the changes:
- A typo in the error message retrieval:
st.Massage()
should best.Message()
.- In the
MultiSearch
andMultiSearchByID
methods, there's a variable name mismatch whereerr
is used instead oferrs
.Please address these issues consistently across all affected methods.
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/remove.go (1)
Line range hint
313-315
: Incorrect mutex usage: MissingUnlock()
callIn the
if err != nil
block within theRemoveByTimestamp
method, the mutexemu
is locked twice without an unlock. This will cause a deadlock because the mutex remains locked.Apply this diff to fix the mutex usage:
if err != nil { emu.Lock() errs = errors.Join(errs, err) - emu.Lock() + emu.Unlock() }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/remove.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/search.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/update.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/upsert.go (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-stream
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: st
[failure] 184-184:
undefined: st
[failure] 185-185:
undefined: st
[failure] 187-187:
undefined: stpkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-sequential
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: st
[failure] 184-184:
undefined: st
[failure] 185-185:
undefined: st
[failure] 187-187:
undefined: stpkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go (1)
Line range hint
1-324
: Overall changes improve error handling in StreamInsert functionThe modifications in this file, particularly in the
StreamInsert
function, align with the PR objective of changing fromParseError
toFromError
. These changes simplify the error handling process and make it more consistent with thestatus
package usage.Key improvements:
- Simplified error handling by using
status.FromError
instead ofstatus.ParseError
.- Consistent approach to setting span attributes and status.
The changes do not affect the public API or function signatures, maintaining backwards compatibility.
These changes look good overall, pending the fixes mentioned in the previous comments. The simplification of error handling should make the code more maintainable and consistent.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-stream
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: st🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-sequential
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: stpkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (3)
Line range hint
1-542
: Summary of Linear Search Handler ReviewThe changes in this file align with the PR objective of modifying
ParseError
toFromError
for the agent handler. However, the implementation has introduced several recurring issues:
- Undefined
st
variables throughout the error handling sections.- Consistent typos in
st.Massage()
method calls (should best.Message()
).- Inconsistent use of
span
andsspan
variables in some error handling contexts.These issues appear systematically across multiple functions: StreamLinearSearch, StreamLinearSearchByID, MultiLinearSearch, and MultiLinearSearchByID.
To address these issues and improve the overall code quality:
- Implement a helper function for error handling to reduce code duplication and minimize errors.
- Conduct a thorough review of all error handling code in this file and related files.
- Implement unit tests specifically for error handling.
- Update your CI/CD pipeline to include static analysis tools for catching these issues automatically.
- Hold a team code review session to establish best practices for error handling and refactoring processes.
After making the suggested changes, please run the verification scripts provided in the individual comments to ensure all instances of these issues have been resolved.
This comprehensive approach will not only fix the current issues but also prevent similar problems in future refactoring efforts, leading to more maintainable and robust code.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-stream
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-sequential
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st
415-418
:⚠️ Potential issueAddress recurring issues and incorrect variable usage
This segment continues to show the same issues we've seen before, with an additional problem:
- The variable
st
is used before it's defined.- There's a typo in
st.Massage()
. It should best.Message()
.- The variable
sspan
is used instead ofspan
, which is likely incorrect in this context.Please apply the following changes:
- st, _ = status.FromError(err) - if st != nil && sspan != nil { + st, _ := status.FromError(err) + if st != nil && span != nil { span.RecordError(err) - span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) span.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) }To ensure all variable names are used correctly in error handling sections, please run the following script:
Please review the results and ensure that the correct span variable is used consistently in each context.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Inconsistent 'span' or 'sspan' Usages Detected
The shell script did not find any occurrences of inconsistent usage of
span
orsspan
in error handling sections ofpkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
. This indicates that the previous issues related to variable usage have been addressed.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for inconsistent use of 'span' and 'sspan' variables in error handling echo "Occurrences of 'span' in error handling:" rg --type go --line-number 'span.*status\.FromError' pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go echo "\nOccurrences of 'sspan' in error handling:" rg --type go --line-number 'sspan.*status\.FromError' pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.goLength of output: 408
518-521
:⚠️ Potential issueFinal instance of systematic error handling issues
This segment in the MultiLinearSearchByID function shows the same issues we've seen throughout the file:
- The variable
st
is used before it's defined.- There's a typo in
st.Massage()
. It should best.Message()
.Please apply the following changes:
- st, _ = status.FromError(err) - if st != nil && sspan != nil { + st, _ := status.FromError(err) + if st != nil && sspan != nil { sspan.RecordError(err) - sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) sspan.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) }These recurring issues throughout the file indicate a systematic problem in the error handling refactoring process. To address this comprehensively:
Implement the helper function for error handling as suggested in the previous comment.
Conduct a thorough review of all error handling code in this file and related files to ensure consistency and correctness.
Consider implementing unit tests specifically for error handling to catch these issues early in the development process.
Set up or update your CI/CD pipeline to include static analysis tools that can catch these types of issues automatically.
Conduct a team code review session to discuss these findings and establish best practices for error handling and refactoring processes.
By addressing these issues systematically, you can improve the overall quality and maintainability of your codebase, reducing the likelihood of similar problems in the future.
To ensure all instances have been addressed, please run the following final verification script:
This script will help ensure that all instances have been corrected and the new pattern is consistently applied throughout the file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go (1)
154-157
: Approve changes with a minor suggestion.The updates to error handling in the
StreamGetObject
method are good improvements:
- Using
status.FromError(err)
simplifies the error parsing process.- The typo fix from
st.Massage()
tost.Message()
is correct.However, there's a minor inconsistency in error variable naming.
Consider updating the error variable name for consistency:
-st, _ = status.FromError(err) +st, _ := status.FromError(err)This change applies to both occurrences (lines 154 and 173).
Also applies to: 173-176
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/upsert.go (2)
155-158
: Improved error handling in StreamUpsert method.The changes to error handling in the StreamUpsert method are good improvements:
- Replacing
status.ParseError
withstatus.FromError
simplifies the error handling and is more idiomatic.- Correcting
st.Massage()
tost.Message()
fixes a critical typo that would have caused runtime errors.These changes enhance the reliability and consistency of error handling in the method.
Consider using a consistent error checking pattern. For example, you could combine the nil checks for
st
andsspan
:if st != nil && sspan != nil { sspan.RecordError(err) sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) sspan.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) }This pattern could be applied to both error handling blocks in the method for consistency.
Also applies to: 174-177
Line range hint
1-330
: Overall improvement in error handling consistency.The changes in this file focus on improving error handling in the StreamUpsert and MultiUpsert methods. These modifications enhance the consistency and correctness of error handling across the file. Key points:
- Consistent use of
status.FromError
instead ofstatus.ParseError
.- Improved error message retrieval (with one remaining typo to be fixed).
- No changes to the core logic of the methods, maintaining existing functionality.
These changes contribute to better reliability and maintainability of the code.
Consider implementing a helper function for error handling to further improve consistency and reduce code duplication. This could encapsulate the common pattern of checking for nil status and span, recording errors, and setting attributes and status.
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (1)
Remaining Issues Found in
linear_search.go
The shell script execution revealed that there are still instances of
st.Massage()
andst, _ = status.FromError
in the following lines:
st.Massage()
:
- Line 350
- Line 369
- Line 399
- Line 418
- Line 459
- Line 480
- Line 521
- Line 542
st, _ = status.FromError
:
- Line 347
- Line 366
- Line 396
- Line 415
- Line 456
- Line 477
- Line 518
- Line 539
Please ensure that all instances are correctly refactored as suggested:
- Replace
st.Massage()
withst.Message()
.- Update
st, _ = status.FromError(err)
to properly declare the variable, for example:st, ok := status.FromError(err)
.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-548
: Overall code review summaryThe changes in this file consistently replace
ParseError
withFromError
, which aligns with the PR objective. However, there are recurring issues throughout the file that need to be addressed:
- The variable
st
is used without being properly declared.- There's a typo in
st.Massage()
, which should best.Message()
.To fix these issues globally, you can use a find-and-replace operation across the entire file with the following pattern:
Find:
st, _ = status.FromError(err) if st != nil && (s|ss)pan != nil { (s|ss)pan.RecordError(err) (s|ss)pan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) (s|ss)pan.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) }
Replace with:
st, ok := status.FromError(err) if ok && $1pan != nil { $1pan.RecordError(err) $1pan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) $1pan.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) }
This will correct all instances of the issue while maintaining the correct span variable name (
span
orsspan
) in each context.After making these changes, please run the following command to ensure all instances have been corrected:
If the command returns any results, please review those lines manually to ensure they've been properly updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining instances of st.Massage() or undeclared st grep -n 'st.Massage()' pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go grep -n 'st, _ = status.FromError' pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.goLength of output: 1075
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-stream
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-sequential
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/remove.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/search.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/update.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/upsert.go (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-stream
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: st
[failure] 184-184:
undefined: st
[failure] 185-185:
undefined: st
[failure] 187-187:
undefined: stpkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-sequential
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: st
[failure] 184-184:
undefined: st
[failure] 185-185:
undefined: st
[failure] 187-187:
undefined: stpkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st
🔇 Additional comments (9)
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go (1)
Line range hint
1-300
: Overall changes look good with minimal impact.The changes in this file are focused on improving error handling in the
StreamGetObject
method. These modifications:
- Simplify the error parsing process.
- Fix a minor typo in the error message extraction.
- Maintain the existing functionality and error handling logic.
The changes are localized and do not affect the overall structure or functionality of the file. The improvements enhance the clarity and efficiency of error handling in the gRPC service method.
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go (1)
Line range hint
1-324
: Overall assessment of changesThe modifications to replace
ParseError
withFromError
in theStreamInsert
method align with the PR objectives and improve error handling consistency. However, there are a couple of minor issues that need to be addressed:
- The undefined variable
st
in theStreamInsert
method.- A typo in the method name
Massage()
which should beMessage()
.Once these issues are resolved, the changes will effectively improve the error handling in the
StreamInsert
method. TheMultiInsert
method remains unchanged, which is appropriate as it doesn't use theParseError
function.Please address the issues mentioned in the previous comment, and the changes will be ready for approval.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-stream
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: st🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-sequential
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: stpkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/remove.go (1)
Line range hint
1-399
: Summary of changes and improvementsThe changes in this file primarily focus on improving error handling by replacing
status.ParseError
withstatus.FromError
. This is a good improvement as it directly retrieves the status from the error.However, there's a consistent typo where
st.Massage()
is used instead ofst.Message()
. This typo should be fixed in all occurrences.Overall, the changes maintain consistency in error handling across the methods and improve the code quality. Once the typo is fixed, these changes will be ready for approval.
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/search.go (6)
398-401
: Typo: ReplaceMassage()
withMessage()
inst.Massage()
The method
st.Massage()
in line 401 should best.Message()
. This typo has been noted previously and should be corrected here as well.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...)
417-420
: Variable inconsistency and typo in method nameIn line 418,
sspan
is used, but in line 420,span
is referenced. Ensure consistent use of the span variable to avoid potential errors. Also, correctst.Massage()
tost.Message()
in line 420.Apply this diff:
- if st != nil && sspan != nil { + if st != nil && span != nil { span.RecordError(err) - span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...)
458-461
: Typo: ReplaceMassage()
withMessage()
inst.Massage()
The typo
st.Massage()
appears again in line 461. Please correct it tost.Message()
.Apply this diff:
- sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...)
479-482
: Variable inconsistency and typo in method nameIn line 480,
sspan
is used, butspan
is referenced in line 482. Ensure consistent variable naming. Also,st.Massage()
should best.Message()
.Apply this diff:
- if st != nil && sspan != nil { + if st != nil && span != nil { span.RecordError(err) - span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...)
520-523
: Typo: ReplaceMassage()
withMessage()
inst.Massage()
Once again, in line 523,
st.Massage()
should best.Message()
. Please correct this typo.Apply this diff:
- sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...)
541-544
: Variable inconsistency and typo in method nameIn line 542,
sspan
is used, butspan
is referenced in line 544. Please ensure consistent variable usage. Also, correctst.Massage()
tost.Message()
.Apply this diff:
- if st != nil && sspan != nil { + if st != nil && span != nil { span.RecordError(err) - span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 24
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go (1)
Multiple Instances of
status.ParseError
andst.Massage()
DetectedThe verification revealed numerous remaining instances of
status.ParseError
across various files, indicating that the global replacement withstatus.FromError
has not been fully completed. Additionally, the typost.Massage()
was found in multiple locations and should be corrected tost.Message()
.Issues to Address:
Replace
status.ParseError
withstatus.FromError
in the following files:
tests/e2e/operation/stream.go
tests/e2e/crud/crud_test.go
pkg/index/job/creation/service/indexer.go
pkg/index/job/save/service/indexer.go
internal/net/grpc/stream.go
- (and others as listed in the script output)
Correct
st.Massage()
tost.Message()
in the following files:
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/update.go
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/search.go
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/upsert.go
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/remove.go
Please ensure these changes are made consistently across the entire codebase to enhance error handling and maintain code integrity.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-300
: Verify the global replacement ofParseError
withFromError
The changes in this file consistently replace
status.ParseError
withstatus.FromError
, which is a good improvement in error handling efficiency. However, the typost.Massage()
instead ofst.Message()
appears multiple times.Please run the following script to check for any remaining instances of
ParseError
and to find any occurrences of theMassage
typo:After running this script, please review the results and ensure that:
- All instances of
ParseError
have been intentionally kept or replaced as needed.- All instances of
st.Massage()
are corrected tost.Message()
.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for remaining instances of ParseError echo "Checking for remaining instances of ParseError:" rg --type go "status\.ParseError" # Check for instances of the Massage typo echo "Checking for instances of the Massage typo:" rg --type go "st\.Massage\(\)"Length of output: 32143
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (1)
Issues Persist in Error Handling Code
The previously identified issues are still present in
linear_search.go
:
- Typo:
st.Massage()
should best.Message()
.- Variable Declaration:
st
is not properly declared with:=
.- Inconsistent Variable Names:
sspan
is used in some places wherespan
should be used.Please address all instances to ensure consistency and correctness in error handling across the entire file.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-548
: Conduct a thorough review of error handling changesThe changes to use
status.FromError
instead ofstatus.ParseError
are good and align with best practices. However, there are consistent issues throughout the file that need to be addressed:
- Typo:
st.Massage()
should best.Message()
.- Variable declaration:
st
is not properly declared with:=
.- Inconsistent variable names:
sspan
is used in some places wherespan
should be used.To ensure all instances are corrected, please run the following script:
After making the corrections, please review the entire file to ensure consistency and correctness in error handling across all methods.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for remaining instances of the typo and incorrect variable usage echo "Checking for remaining issues..." rg "st\.Massage\(\)" pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go rg "st, _ = status\.FromError" pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go rg "if st != nil && sspan != nil" pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go # If any of the above commands find matches, they will return a non-zero exit code if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Issues found. Please review and correct all instances." else echo "No remaining issues found. All instances appear to be corrected." fiLength of output: 1574
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-stream
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-sequential
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/remove.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/search.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/update.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/upsert.go (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-stream
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: st
[failure] 184-184:
undefined: st
[failure] 185-185:
undefined: st
[failure] 187-187:
undefined: stpkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-sequential
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: st
[failure] 184-184:
undefined: st
[failure] 185-185:
undefined: st
[failure] 187-187:
undefined: stpkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
[failure] 347-347:
undefined: st
[failure] 348-348:
undefined: st
[failure] 350-350:
undefined: st
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go (1)
165-168
:⚠️ Potential issueFix undefined variable and update error handling logic
The changes to use
status.FromError
instead ofstatus.ParseError
simplify the error handling. However, there's a critical issue with an undefined variablest
. This needs to be addressed to prevent runtime errors.To fix this issue and improve the error handling, apply the following changes:
- st, _ = status.FromError(err) - if st != nil && sspan != nil { + st, ok := status.FromError(err) + if ok && sspan != nil { sspan.RecordError(err) - sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) sspan.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) } // ... (similar changes in the second block) - st, _ = status.FromError(err) - if st != nil && span != nil { + st, ok := status.FromError(err) + if ok && span != nil { span.RecordError(err) - span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) span.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) }These changes will:
- Properly declare and check the
st
variable.- Use
ok
to check if the conversion was successful.- Fix the typo in
st.Massage()
tost.Message()
.After making these changes, please run the following command to ensure there are no remaining issues with undefined variables:
This command will help verify that the
st
variable is properly defined within theStreamInsert
function.Also applies to: 184-187
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-stream
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: st🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-sequential
[failure] 165-165:
undefined: st
[failure] 166-166:
undefined: st
[failure] 168-168:
undefined: stpkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/update.go (2)
213-216
: Potential nil pointer dereference ofst
Similar to the issue in lines 194-197,
st
may benil
ifstatus.FromError(err)
cannot extract a*status.Status
fromerr
. Accessingst.Code()
andst.Message()
without checking can cause a nil pointer dereference.Consider adding a nil check for
st
:-st, _ = status.FromError(err) +st, _ := status.FromError(err) +if st != nil { span.RecordError(err) - span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) + span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) span.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) +}
216-216
: Typo in method nameMassage
This is the same typo as previously mentioned. Replace
Massage()
withMessage()
to correct the method call.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Massage())...) +span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...)
Deploying vald with Cloudflare Pages
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (2)
347-350
: Approved changes with a minor suggestion.The modifications in this segment improve error handling and fix previous issues:
- Using
status.FromError(err)
simplifies error parsing.- Properly declaring
st
with:=
resolves the undefined variable issue.- Correcting
Massage()
toMessage()
fixes the method name typo.These changes enhance code correctness and readability.
Consider using a more descriptive variable name than
st
, such aserrStatus
, to improve code clarity:- st, _ := status.FromError(err) - if st != nil && sspan != nil { + errStatus, _ := status.FromError(err) + if errStatus != nil && sspan != nil { sspan.RecordError(err) - sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) + sspan.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(errStatus.Code(), errStatus.Message())...) sspan.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) }
Issues Identified in
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
The verification script has uncovered several issues that need to be addressed:
Undefined
sspan
Variable:
- Multiple instances where
sspan
is used without consistent definition or scope management.Incorrect Use of
err
Instead oferrs
:
- Numerous occurrences of
err.Error()
suggest thaterr
is being used in places whereerrs
should be utilized.Use of
st
Variable:
- The variable
st
is frequently used, which may lead to ambiguity and reduce code clarity. Consider using more descriptive names likestatus
orerrorStatus
.Category:
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-546
: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe modifications throughout this file have consistently improved error handling and status reporting by:
- Replacing
status.ParseError
withstatus.FromError
.- Correcting the method name from
Massage()
toMessage()
.- Properly declaring status variables using
:=
.However, several issues need to be addressed across the entire file:
- Resolve the undefined
sspan
variable by consistently using eitherspan
orsspan
.- Correct instances where
err
is used instead oferrs
.- Use more descriptive variable names, e.g.,
errStatus
instead ofst
.To improve code maintainability and reduce the likelihood of similar issues in the future, consider implementing a helper function for error status setting and span updates, as suggested in the previous comment.
To ensure all instances of these issues are addressed, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any remaining instances of the issues discussed in the review.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "Checking for potential issues:" echo "1. Undefined sspan variable:" rg --type go 'sspan' pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go echo "2. Incorrect use of err instead of errs:" rg --type go 'err\.Error\(\)' pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go echo "3. Use of st variable:" rg --type go '\bst\b' pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.goLength of output: 4850
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/remove.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/search.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/update.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/upsert.go (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/insert.go
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/remove.go
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/search.go
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/update.go
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/upsert.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-sequential
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
[failure] 367-367:
undefined: sspan
[failure] 416-416:
undefined: sspan
[failure] 477-477:
undefined: err
[failure] 478-478:
undefined: sspan
[failure] 479-479:
undefined: err
[failure] 539-539:
undefined: err
[failure] 540-540:
undefined: sspan
[failure] 541-541:
undefined: err
🪛 GitHub Check: grpc-stream
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go
[failure] 367-367:
undefined: sspan
[failure] 416-416:
undefined: sspan
[failure] 477-477:
undefined: err
[failure] 478-478:
undefined: sspan
[failure] 479-479:
undefined: err
[failure] 539-539:
undefined: err
[failure] 540-540:
undefined: sspan
[failure] 541-541:
undefined: err
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (7)
346-350
: Improved error handling, but potential undefined variable.The changes in this segment improve error handling by using
status.FromError
and fix the typo fromMassage()
toMessage()
. However, there's a potential issue:
- The
sspan
variable is used but may be undefined. This could lead to a runtime error ifsspan
is nil.Consider updating the condition to check if
sspan
is not nil beforest
:- if st != nil && sspan != nil { + if sspan != nil && st != nil {This change ensures that
sspan
is checked first, preventing a potential nil pointer dereference.
395-398
: Consistent improvements, butsspan
issue persists.The changes in this segment maintain consistency with the previous improvements:
- Using
status.FromError(err)
for error parsing.- Properly declaring
st
with:=
.- Correcting
Massage()
toMessage()
.However, the potential issue with
sspan
being undefined still exists. Consider updating the condition:- if st != nil && sspan != nil { + if sspan != nil && st != nil {This change ensures that
sspan
is checked first, preventing a potential nil pointer dereference.
455-458
: Consistent improvements, butsspan
issue persists.The changes in this segment maintain consistency with the previous improvements:
- Using
status.FromError(err)
for error parsing.- Properly declaring
st
with:=
.- Correcting
Massage()
toMessage()
.However, the potential issue with
sspan
being undefined still exists. Consider updating the condition:- if st != nil && sspan != nil { + if sspan != nil && st != nil {This change ensures that
sspan
is checked first, preventing a potential nil pointer dereference.
476-482
: Consistent improvements, but error variable inconsistency.The changes in this segment maintain consistency with the previous improvements in error handling and status reporting. However, there's an inconsistency in the error variable name:
- The error variable is named
errs
instead oferr
.Consider updating the error variable name for consistency:
- st, _ := status.FromError(errs) - if st != nil && span != nil { - span.RecordError(errs) - span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) - span.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, errs.Error()) + st, _ := status.FromError(err) + if st != nil && span != nil { + span.RecordError(err) + span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) + span.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) } - return nil, errs + return nil, errThis change ensures consistency with the error variable naming convention used in other parts of the file.
517-520
: Consistent improvements, butsspan
issue persists.The changes in this segment maintain consistency with the previous improvements:
- Using
status.FromError(err)
for error parsing.- Properly declaring
st
with:=
.- Correcting
Massage()
toMessage()
.However, the potential issue with
sspan
being undefined still exists. Consider updating the condition:- if st != nil && sspan != nil { + if sspan != nil && st != nil {This change ensures that
sspan
is checked first, preventing a potential nil pointer dereference.
538-544
: Consistent improvements, but error variable inconsistency persists.The changes in this segment maintain consistency with the previous improvements in error handling and status reporting. However, the inconsistency in the error variable name persists:
- The error variable is named
errs
instead oferr
.Consider updating the error variable name for consistency:
- st, _ := status.FromError(errs) - if st != nil && span != nil { - span.RecordError(errs) - span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) - span.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, errs.Error()) + st, _ := status.FromError(err) + if st != nil && span != nil { + span.RecordError(err) + span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) + span.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) } - return nil, errs + return nil, errThis change ensures consistency with the error variable naming convention used in other parts of the file.
Line range hint
1-547
: Overall improvements with minor issues to addressThe changes in this file consistently improve error handling and status reporting across multiple functions. The main improvements include:
- Replacing
status.ParseError
withstatus.FromError
for more streamlined error parsing.- Properly declaring the
st
variable using:=
.- Correcting the typo from
Massage()
toMessage()
.However, there are two recurring issues that should be addressed:
Potential undefined
sspan
variable: In several functions, the conditionif st != nil && sspan != nil
should be changed toif sspan != nil && st != nil
to prevent potential nil pointer dereferences.Inconsistent error variable naming: In some functions, the error variable is named
errs
instead oferr
. This should be standardized across the file.To resolve these issues comprehensively, consider the following actions:
- Perform a global search and replace for the
sspan
condition, ensuring it's checked first in all occurrences.- Standardize the error variable name to
err
throughout the file.- Implement a helper function for error handling to reduce code duplication and ensure consistency. For example:
func handleError(span *trace.Span, err error) { if st, _ := status.FromError(err); st != nil && span != nil { span.RecordError(err) span.SetAttributes(trace.FromGRPCStatus(st.Code(), st.Message())...) span.SetStatus(trace.StatusError, err.Error()) } }Then use this helper function throughout the file:
handleError(span, err)These changes will improve code consistency and maintainability while addressing the minor issues found during the review.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/remove.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/search.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/update.go (2 hunks)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/upsert.go (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/object.go
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/remove.go
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/search.go
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/update.go
- pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/upsert.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pkg/agent/core/ngt/handler/grpc/linear_search.go (2)
365-368
: Consistent improvement in error handling.The changes in this segment are consistent with the previous improvements:
- Using
status.FromError
for error parsing.- Properly declaring
st
with:=
.- Correcting
Massage()
toMessage()
.These changes enhance error handling and maintain consistency throughout the function.
414-417
: Consistent improvement in error handling.The changes in this segment maintain consistency with the previous improvements:
- Using
status.FromError(err)
for error parsing.- Properly declaring
st
with:=
.- Correcting
Massage()
toMessage()
.These changes enhance error handling and maintain consistency throughout the function.
* modify ParseError to FromError * fix typo * fix typo * fix typo * fix typo * fix imported and not used error --------- Co-authored-by: Kosuke Morimoto <[email protected]>
* modify ParseError to FromError * fix typo * fix typo * fix typo * fix typo * fix imported and not used error --------- Co-authored-by: datelier <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kosuke Morimoto <[email protected]>
Description
SSIA
Related Issue
Versions
Checklist
Special notes for your reviewer
Summary by CodeRabbit
These changes collectively improve the reliability and maintainability of error handling within the application.