CCPP Framework Meeting Minutes 2021 06 29

Agenda

Several standard names in PR that mean the same thing, and a few more open questions
- See https://github.com/ESCOMP/CCPPStandardNames/pull/13
- Grant to send an email to Cheryl who will ask in her science group
PRs for host models not yet created
- Grant will create PRs once the remaining questions are addressed

See https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-physics/pull/679
This approach makes sense but we should strive for consistency and update the documentation to explicitly allow this
Not consistent with plans for the future (diagnostic output from CCPP)
Dom should update the PR with information on what is in the array (get input from Eric)

Training for CAM scientists to port their parameterizations to CCPP, a few of them will start this work soon
- video of training: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-_Cem_O_Zo-rnrQtob3SnMDo37fwKC9z/view?usp=sharing
- The powerpoint presentation (non-recording version) is at: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13mLaCEsmRJfigiY4GyyhKMN790_hqc_u/edit#slide=id.p12
- The link for the actual conversion document with all the details is at: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13mLaCEsmRJfigiY4GyyhKMN790_hqc_u/edit#slide=id.p1
- These may or may not be accessible to everyone (google drive settings). Please request access if needed
Thompson MP development meeting
- Scheme should be run with smaller time step
- Can either use CCPP subcycling capability or implement an inner loop inside the scheme itself
- Is subcycling capability in CCPP too prone to errors (because changes need to be made inside the scheme as well, at least until we automatically pass the correct time step down to the scheme)

CCPP Framework wiki